Find the Long Island Press near you.

Enter zip below
Search


Advanced Search
Friday, July 30, 2010
7/16/2008 7:24:00 PM Email this articlePrint this article 
Changing Perspectives On Childhood Vaccinations

ALAN P. SHERR,D.C. & DR. LAWRENCE PALEVSKY

Editor's note: This was written in response to the KidFixer column by William Mesibov, M.D. that appeared in the Press on July 10. The columns do not necessarily express the opinions of the Long Island Press.

Hundreds of families come to our office every year, frightened, disillusioned, angry, and eager to explore and discover alternative ways to help their children. They come in hopes that their sons and daughters will achieve higher functioning and more optimal well-being.

The diagnoses are most often the same: autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

The most common question we hear: Is it possible that vaccines caused or contributed to the creation of our children's neurological problems? The question is logical and correlative, yet the answer the parents often receive from the conventional medical community is, "It's just a coincidence." But these parents see regression right before their eyes, repeatedly. Each of their stories corresponds to a vaccine event, they say.

The number of children in this country who have ASD has increased (it's now 1 in 150), and one in six reportedly have some form of neuro-developmental delay, with boys affected more than girls, by a 4-to-1 ratio. So it is reasonable for parents and practitioners to consider larger questions: Genetic epidemics don't exist, so what is contributing to the increasing rate of ASD? What role do vaccinations play in selecting for these neurological problems? What, if any, underlying considerations need to be studied, and by whom?

Is it possible that couples conceiving babies today have weakened immune systems and are passing this down to their children? How does exposure to toxins from food, water, air, antibiotics, medications, pesticides, plastics, flame retardants, cosmetics, heavy metals, electromagnetic radiation, sonograms, epidurals, C-sections, formula, AND vaccines play a role in impairing optimal function in their bodies, which is passed on genetically to their infants, who are then exposed to many of these factors in utero and after birth in early infancy?

Possibly all of the above-and maybe none. But the literature is beginning to fill with answers that support our suspicions and you, the public, are being prevented from seeing the results.

In our office we encourage parents to feed their children healthier diets. We support children's digestive function and provide vitamins and minerals to compensate for deficiencies. We make sure that children are neurologically balanced and support participation in behavioral therapies. We specifically ask parents to stop or wean medical interventions (drugs, antibiotics, medications, vaccines), to give their children's immune systems an opportunity to rest, rebuild and, over time, to adapt and compensate optimally.

The children improve...and become more functionally balanced.

Do vaccines cause or contribute to the onset of neurological problems and autism?

Maybe it's time for us to be more open-minded, to explore the variables. It is our children and the coming generations that will suffer from our unwillingness to question and study. Science, after all, is the study of asking questions and discovering answers-and accepting these answers, regardless of what our preconceived notions may be about the outcomes we expected or wanted.

We offer you a paraphrase of an ancient proverb: Beware of those who think they know but know not that they know not.

They are the most dangerous.

Chiropractor Alan P. Sherr, D.C. and holistic pediatrician Dr. Lawrence B. Palevsky are in practice at the Northport Wellness Center (www.northportwellnesscenter.com).





Reader Comments


Posted: Tuesday, July 22, 2008
Article comment by:

It was with disappointment that I read the Long Island Press’ disclaimer over Dr. Mesibov's excellent article on childhood vaccination (1) and the so-called ‘counterpoint’ to his editorial in the following issue by Sherr and Palevsky (2). This is akin to allowing creationists equal time in discussions about evolutionary biology or giving astrologers equal credibility as astronomers about the origins of the universe. The Long Island Press does its readership a disservice by granting these pseudoscientists an unmerited platform.

Sherr and Palevsky begin their misinformation-laden editorial with “The number of children in this country who have ASD has increased (it's now 1 in 150).” This is a highly misleading statement. In fact, while 1 in 150 children may in fact be diagnosed with ASD, it isn’t clear at all that there is a so-called “autism epidemic” as implied by Sherr and Palevsky. Recent studies (3) actually suggest that the large number of children carrying the diagnosis of ASD today reflects increased awareness about the signs and symptoms of autism among health-care professionals and the general public, as well as changes in diagnostic criteria of autism. Children incorrectly diagnosed with learning disabilities, developmental delays, schizophrenia, cerebral palsy, or just “being different” 20 years ago are more likely to be correctly diagnosed with autism today.

Sherr and Palevsky also seem to favor anectodal reporting by parents over the large body of scientific evidence that has thoroughly disproved a causative relationship between vaccinations and autism (4,5). While this may make for good business in their clinic, it is unarguably bad science and a poor basis for rational medical practice.

“But the literature is beginning to fill with answers that support our suspicions and you, the public, are being prevented from seeing the results”. Really? Perhaps Sherr and Palevsky could have shared some of these studies with the public, then, in their editorial. As a medical professional, I also have not been privy to these concealed studies (maybe I didn’t get the memo?) and am curious to see them. And who, exactly, is concealing these studies? The pharmaceutical companies? The media? The government? All of them?

Most incredible, however, is their claim of “improvement” in autistics referred to their practice after their “treatment regimen”. Are they suggesting that they have cured autistic patients? By what metric are they claiming improvement? Have they published their findings (my online PubMed database search for “Palevsky”, “Sherr”, and “autism” yielded exactly zero results)? Is there any distinction made between mild (higher functioning) versus severe autistic children in their recovery claims? Sadly (and not unexpectedly) this specific information is nowhere to be found either in their editorial or on their practice website.

In conclusion, I offer Sherr and Palevsky a paraphrased aphorism of my own: “It’s good to be open-minded, but not so much that your brains fall out of your head.” I also would like to offer the readership of the Long Island Press a much more useful website: the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia page dedicated to exposing and refuting vaccination myths: http://vaccine.chop.edu.

Sincerely,

Biju Abraham, D.O. Winthrop-University Hospital Mineola, NY

References:

1. Is It Dangerous To Vaccinate My Child? William Mesibov, M.D. The Long Island Press 7/9/2008.

2. Changing Perspectives On Childhood Vaccinations. Alan Sherr, D.C. and Lawrence Palevsky, M.D. The Long Island Press 7/16/2008.

3. Bishop D et al. Autism and diagnostic substitution: Evidence from a study of adults with a history of developmental language disorder. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. 2008 May;50(5):341-5

4. Hviid A, et al. Association between thimerosal-containing vaccine and autism. Journal of the American Medical Association 290:1763-1766, 2003.

5. Madsen KM, et al. A population-based study of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination and autism. New England Journal of Medicine. 347:1477-1482, 2002.


Article Comment Submission Form
Please feel free to submit your comments.

Article comments are not posted immediately to the Web site. Each submission must be approved by the Web site editor, who may edit content for appropriateness. There may be a delay of 24-48 hours for any submission while the web site editor reviews and approves it.

Note: All information on this form is required.
Name:
Passcode: This form will not send your comment unless you copy exactly the passcode seen below into the text field. This is an anti-spam device to help reduce the automated email spam coming through this form.

Please copy the passcode exactly
- it is case sensitive.
Message:
   
  Long Island Press & LongIslandPress.com, All rights reserved.
Software © 1998-2010 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved